Research

What We're Working On

 

Image
Headshot for Professor Susan Aaronson

Closing the Loop: Making Civic Feedback Inclusive, Responsive, and Ongoing

Researcher: Susan Aaronson
Department: Elliott School of International Affairs


The project researchers use a mixed method approach to examine federal AI consultations (2023–2025) and then compare the US approach to other democracies. What can the US learn and how can it ensure that a wide variety of Americans are "heard." This project will examine key gaps in participation, communication, and responsiveness, and explore how consultative processes might be improved to better reflect public concerns and strengthen trust in AI governance.

 

 

Image
Headshot of Professor Marc Lynch

AI, Digital Surveillance and Democracy in the Middle East 

Researcher: Marc Lynch
Department: Political Science & Elliott School of International Affairs  


This project examines how AI-driven surveillance enhances state control while also creating new opportunities for civil activism. Moving beyond earlier debates that framed digital technologies as either liberating or repressive, the research focuses on how these dynamics interact in practice—shaping political behavior, collective action, and state-society relations.

 

Image
Headshot of Professor Jasmine Smith

Does POC Identity Predict Support for POC Representation?

Researcher: Jasmine Carrera Smith
Department: Political Science


Drawing on survey experiments with Asian, Black, and Latino Americans, the study tests whether a Person of Color's (POC) identity shapes both vote choice and willingness to support non-co-racial minority candidates. This project addresses two key gaps: the extent to which POC identity translates into support for non-co-racial representation, and how solidarity across racial and ethnic groups operates in electoral contexts. 

 

Image
Headshot of Professor Julian Wamble

The Disbelief Shield: Partisan Motivated Reasoning and AI Misattribution

Researcher: Julian Wamble
Department: Political Science


Using a survey experiment with 2,000 American adults, the study tests whether expressive partisans are disproportionately likely to invoke this disbelief shield when genuine content implicates their own party. The core argument is that fabricated images can be fact-checked, but motivated disbelief is far harder to dislodge, making AI misattribution potentially more corrosive to democratic accountability than deep fakes themselves.

 

Image
Headshot of Professor Tony Yang

Corporate Health Misinformation in the Digital Age: How Industry-Funded  Narratives on Social Media Undermine Regulatory Trust and Civic Engagement 

Researcher: Y. Tony Yang
Department: School of Nursing & Milken Institute School of Public Health


This project investigates how exposure to industry-associated health misinformation shapes public trust in regulatory institutions, attitudes toward government authority, and civic participation among U.S. adults. Combining computational analysis of Reddit and YouTube content with a nationally sampled survey, the study maps how these narratives spread and assesses their broader democratic effects.

 


Featured Research

Photo of building in Washington, DC

Designing a New Digital Regulator

March 31, 2026

IDDP and the Vanderbilt Policy Accelerator hosted a summit to discuss the need for a New Digital Regulator.

Pixelated smartphone turned sideways with the words "autonomy theater" on the screen.

Performing in Autonomy Theater

November 13, 2025

This study explores how to balance the needs of social media researchers with perspectives of high-profile figures.

PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Why Depolarization is Hard: Evaluating Attempts to Decrease Partisan Animosity in America

September 23, 2025

Affective polarization is a corrosive force in American politics.

Abstract image of map linking logos for different social media platforms

From Dashboard to Data Acquisition

September 8, 2025

Researchers increasingly require data from social media companies to better understand the information environment, product design and social issues.

Cambridge University Press

“Keep Your Heads Held High Boys!”: Examining the Relationship between the Proud Boys’ Online Discourse and Offline Activities

February 13, 2024

This study examines the relationship between online communication by the Proud Boys and their offline activities.

Journal of Communication

Visual Misinformation on Facebook

February 28, 2023

In this study the researchers conducted the first large-scale study of image-based political misinformation on Facebook.

PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Time and Skeptical Opinion Content Erode the Effects of Science Coverage on Climate Beliefs and Attitudes

June 21, 2022

Although experiments show that exposure to factual information can increase factual accuracy, the public remains stubbornly misinformed about many issues.

Plos One

Twitter and Facebook Posts About COVID-19 Are Less Likely to Spread Misinformation Compared to Other Health Topics

January 12, 2022

Sceptics charge that ordinary citizens are not competent enough to sustain democracy. The researchers challenge this assessment in this paper.

 


Browse by Publication Type

 

Browse All Publications